Most of my pictures are taken not horizontally nor vertically to the horizon and the pictures are mostly not balanced. For some pictures (the darker and the brighter ones), I messed with the lighting values on my phone to make it look unfairly flashing or dark. The darker photos also brought a spooky mood to a common hallway which I intended. In this case, I don’t think rules are needed.
- When might it be a good idea to deliberately break the rules?
I think art is all about creativity, so the rules could be broken to make abstract and confusing photographs. For example, the last 3 pictures are very confusing at first glance, but as I look more, I see them as good photos. I think breaking the rules that people set up can result in very different styles and artistic outcomes.
2. Do you think it is possible to break rules if you don’t know they exist? Give reasons for your answer.
I think it is not possible to break rules if you don’t know they exist. If a rule was not known, one would not have any intention to break it, as one can not avoid what one does not know. For example, people who do not realize that the photo should be horizontal to the horizon would not intentionally take pictures that are not horizontal only because they want to break the rule.
3. Can a ‘bad’ picture ever be ‘great’? – How important is the context in photography?
In my opinion, any picture taken with an intention could be “great” if it expresses their artistic intent. For example, the picture “Wrong” by John Baldassari is a great picture as it successfully triggered many people into thinking that it feels “wrong”. In my scenario, the pictures where the hallways are sideways successfully expressed my intent of confusing the audience.