For Grade 9 Science & Engineering’s Engineering project, we were asked to design a product which demonstrates the transfer of energy. My product is a rubber-band powered paper airplane launcher. Here’s an image of the final product:
The product ended up not functioning correctly as the friction caused by the rubber bands rubbing against the sides stopped the airplane from launching.
Here are some additional questions that I will ask myself to reflect on this project.
What transfer of energy is shown in this product?
This product receives the kinetic energy of an arm pulling back the launch capsule, and converts that to elastic potential energy. When a finger pulls the trigger using kinetic energy, the elastic potential energy is converted into kinetic energy and would launch the plane forwards, with a small portion being converted to waste energy types like thermal and sound.
What would I do differently if I could do this project again?
If I could do this project again, I would plan in 3 dimensions. This product would have worked if thickness wasn’t a factor, but things like hot glue and the difference in cardboard and wood thicknesses made the product fail. Something else I would do differently is to spend less time on Define & Inquire. I spent more than enough time not doing anything and just thinking about whether my ideas are good enough to move to Develop & Plan, which forced me to later spend my first Create & Improve lesson on planning.
What do I think I did well?
I think I did many things well in this project, despite the final product not working. I feel like my plan was a good plan, since it is detailed and includes several features which improved the product, such as the aim assist and the trigger mechanism. I also think that I used Affinity Designer rather well, since I never used Affinity before this project. I got a decent grasp on the application rather quickly.
Recent Comments