Kieran

It is what it is.

Category: Photogrophy (page 3 of 3)

Pictorialism and Straight Photography

The pictorialism movement in photography was a movement where photographers made their photos seem like pieces of art rather than a shot of reality. They did this by using special effects, altering the focus, and many other techniques to make their photos look like art pieces. On the other hand, straight photography is quite the opposite. Straight photography is when you are trying to capture a part of reality, making it seem as real as possible and being truly a photograph rather than a painting, like pictorialism is.

Edward Weston and Aaron Siskind were both very influential straight photographers, however in different ways. Edward Weston focused on taking highly detailed photos of the things that were, making sure to make it seem as real and focused as possible. He was known for incredibly sharp images of landscapes and natural forms. Aaron Siskind was similar yet different, he also focused on straight photography, but, he had a sense of abstraction to it. He would take photos that were as detailed as possible in a way that the thing he was photographing would seem like something different. Rather than the traditional literalness of straight photography.

Edward Weston example:                                            Aaron Siskind example:

Whilst Andreas Gursky and Uta Barth’s photographs may not seem particularly abstract, they are. Andreas Gursky is known for his grand-scale landscape photographs, however, they are also digitally altered. With him combining photos and changing certain elements of the composition to enhance the meaning and impact of his photos. To me, he is neither a true pictorialist nor a true straight photographer. Yet he is still an abstract one. As he seems to take literal photos, meaning he is not a pictorialist, yet he edits his photos, meaning he is not fully a straight photographer. However his photos do seem to lean towards straight photography, yet they are not the normal close up detailed photos that can be seen in photographers like Edward Weston and AaronSiskind’s work. Uta Barth is somewhat similar as well, as she also takes photos of landscapes and urban environments, as well as she also alters her photos. Changing the amount of blur and focus a photo has. Also making her art abstract, somewhat similar to Gursky. In my opinion she leans more towards pictorialism as her photos seem edited to look more like painting, used to convey meaning and enhance the message present. Whilst also incorporating elemts of straight photography with her taking photos of natural and urban forms. Capturing moments in time altered  to seem like half-paintings.

Andreas Gursky example:               Uta Barth example:

                               

Black and White Abstraction

ok

WRONG! The 10 Worst

In this blog post, I will be showcasing my 10 worst photos taken within a 30-minute period. In this time period I was intentionally trying to take bad photos that broke the rules of photography, some of the ones to note are the rule of thirds, focal point, lighting, and focus. These were all broken in multiple of my photos, hence the name, “WRONG!”

I accomplished this by intentionally taking photos of things that were not captivating and did not seem thought out. Trying to make the photos look like a mistake. This was done by going too close to people or objects, intentionally shaking the camera whilst pressing the photo button to create the idea of a moving camera, as well as altering my focus and light balances to make the photos seem blurry, too light, and too dark. This can be seen in my 6th and 10th photos, with my 6th being dark enough to not be able to see everything in frame and the 10th being too bright so that everything is covered in a bright white. I also had photos that were incredibly grainy such as my 3rd and 4th photos, which look like they were taken on a camera from the 90’s where in actuality they were taken on a modern camera. All in all, I think I achieved the goal of taking “wrong” photos and I think the 10 I chose prove this.

Can you take a wrong picture?

Can you take a wrong picture?

I don’t think that it is possible to take a “wrong” picture as “wrong” implies that it is incorrect or the wrong answer, and photography isn’t an answer. However it can be deemed wrong in the eyes of photographers and people that like photos if you take a photo a certain way that makes it not be as appealing or not look as good, so really there are better ways to take photos but there isn’t necessarily a wrong way.

How is context important in Photography? Does the word “Wrong” make a difference? Why?

Context is important in photography as it can enhance or give new meaning towards a photo. Creating a story behind the picture that wouldn’t be possible to be known without it. However you can still take good photos without context, it all depends on what you want that photo to mean. I think that the only difference the word “wrong” can make is swaying the opinion of how you perceive a photo. If you think the original photo is good because you like the grain and black and white quality, then hear someone call it wrong, you may think worse about the photo than before.

Newer posts

© 2025 Kieran

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Skip to toolbar