I believe I did a decent job of showing the similarities between the three images in my triptych, especially in terms of how they highlight sunlight with frame. Every picture has a specific layout that highlights the relationship between light and shadow. For instance, the kind light at the bottom of the first picture serves as a silent background at first. It became my main light source and showed out once I changed the exposure. The change gives the image depth in addition to drawing attention to the main subject. Furthermore, a contrast that highlights the lighter portions is produced by the lack of light at the top. I produced an overall visual narrative that invites viewers to look at the light details in every shot by carefully balancing these components. All things considered, I like how the triptych ties these concepts together. There is a really strong connection between this triptych and Uta Barth because Uta Barth is known for using photography to examine perception and the nature of seeing. Her art often emphasizes light play, narrow depth of field, and blurry pictures that encourage viewers to look rather than just recognize what is being shown, in this triptych, it shows a sense of unclearness, which is created by the blurry, also the contrast between the light and dark structures also fits Uta Barth’s vision. Furthermore, I believe this triptych is more of a pictorial photography style because I’m drawn in by the abstract and blurry aspects, which encourage a more emotional reaction than a simple identification of the topics, by the sense of blurriness, showing the uncertainty of everything, resulting the triptych is pictorial photography, rather than straight photography.

second triptych

I wanted to make it the main focal point. In order to get an abstract effect that highlights the background colors of pink, green, and yellow and makes them stand out against the black background, I intentionally blurred the middle image with 4 separate part, which by making my camera angle closer, showing an sense of miserable. the contrast between dark and light shows how light can both light and expose the complexity of life that are often buried.  which makes me think about my own feelings and experiences while also allowing viewers to interact with the meaningful story I’ve created using light and shadow.

Yellow photo

In general, the picture could have been clearer and more in line with the artistic idea, making it more effective and engaging. The purpose of the intentionally out-of-focus pictures is to create a mood, but the theme did not work well; it attempted to connect with Uta Barth’s style, but it did not quite match her vision, and the blurry quality made it more difficult for viewers to connect with the images, which made them a yellow photo

Green Photo

These photo are green photo because these uses sense of blurriness to challenges  viewer’s perception of truth also creating a sense of odd fantasy. The audience is drawn into a reflective state by this abstract aspect, which invites individual interpretation and emotional connection. Barth asks us to pay attention to the emotions and memories that remain beyond the frame in addition to what is obvious right away by lowering edges and blurring features, which these statement shows that it should be Green Photo

Red Photo

I attempt with combining street photography and abstraction in this set of images. A unclear object in the center gives the pictures a sense of wonder and dreaminess. For example, I added texture and mystery by using cracked glasses as the focus point in the third image. People are drawn into the design by the contrast between the abstract nature of the glasses and the street landscape in the background. I want to trigger feelings and encourage interpretation by mixing soft and hard elements, giving the commonplace an exceptional quality. Every picture documents a moment that is both recognizable and unreal.

What is was the Pictorialism Movement in photography?
The Pictorialism Movement in photography, which developed in the late nineteenth century, stressed creative expression through soft focus and modification, resulting in pictures that looked like paintings. In contrast, the Straight Photography approach, which emerged in the 1910s, emphasized real detail, using strong focus and natural lighting without editing.

What was the straight photography movement in photography? How is straight photography different to pictorialist? Why was the straight photography movement popular amongst photographers?

Straight photography shows and interacts with the camera’s technological abilities; the main difference is in intent, Pictorialism takes emotional effect through artistic control, while Straight Photography emphasizes truth and the medium’s basic traits. This later movement gained popularity as photographers took modern and aimed to emphasize the truth of the photographic picture.

How have Edward Weston and Aaron Siskind (above) been influenced by the Straight Photography Movement?

Edward Weston and Aaron Siskind were heavily influenced by the Straight Photography Movement, which shows clarity. Weston’s still lifes were characterized by a focus on form and texture, as well as precise and detailed subject capture. Siskind’s work, while often abstract, focused on real images of urban textures that reflected his themes’ impact on viewers. Both photographers accepted the movement’s principles, while demonstrating their technical ability, reaffirming the core of Straight Photography.

What makes the work of contemporary photographers Andreas Gursky and Uta Barth abstract? Can they be classified as pictorialist or straight photographers? Explain your response.

Andreas Gursky and Uta Barth do not easily fit into the classifications of pictorialist or straight photographers; Gursky’s deeply improved photos break from realism, while Barth’s focus on experience provides a more complex perspective. Their work is abstract because to Gursky’s large-scale pieces, which hide detail and comment on globalization, and Barth’s use of focus and fade which allows for personal assessments of light and space. They challenge created categorization and represent the complex nature of contemporary photography.

Uta

Gursky

Work cited

“Edward Weston.” Center for Creative Photography, 18 Nov. 2021, ccp.arizona.edu/artists/edward-weston.

Uta Barth

why did I choose she/How will you adapt this style to your own photography? How does the image/artist inspire YOU?

I chose Uta Barth’s photography because it captures the essence of perception and the change of moments. Her art sometimes reduces the difficulties between reality and abstraction, allowing viewers to connect with the images on a deeper emotional level. Barth’s use of light and focus creates a distinct atmosphere that elicits feelings of nostalgia and reflection. I appreciate how she challenges traditional photography by emphasizing what is often overlooked, encouraging us to see the world in new ways. Her ability to transform ordinary scenes into thought-provoking art resonates with me and inspires contemplation. To mimic Barth’s approach in my own photography, I plan to experiment with selective focus and light control, emphasizing the emotional impact of my subjects. My goal is to create photographs that inspire viewers to pause and think, much as Barth’s does.

Style

In these pictures, she uses selective focus and blurring to hide features, producing an air of mystery. This encourages viewers to understand the image rather than just recognize it., I appreciate Uta Barth’s style since it is simple and focuses on light. She often highlights minor details, evoking a peaceful and reflective atmosphere. Her use of natural light gives her photographs a warm, dreamlike look that makes them inviting. I really like how she uses focus and blurring to draw our attention to certain aspects while leaving others unclear. This style enables viewers to reflect more deeply on what they see, making her work feel both personal and universal. Overall, her approach invites quiet reflection on daily moments.

Picture

Why did I choose this picture?

I choose this picture because it inspires reflection and nostalgia. Its gentle concentration generates a variety of emotional reactions by bringing the audience into a moment that feels both close and universal.

What do you find surprising or unusual about this photograph?

This photograph’s purposeful blurriness is its most unexpected feature. It creates a dreamy atmosphere that invites viewers to interact with their own memories and emotions by inviting ambiguity rather than offering a clear subject.

Formal element

Focus is a particularly significant element in this picture. An sense of distance and abstraction is produced by the soft focus, which heightens the image’s emotional impact. This lack of clarity allows viewers to project their own ideas onto the image, making it a more personal experience.

I want my audience to examine how our perceptions of the world are influenced by our own experiences while also taking into account the complexity of vision in our cultural and environmental surroundings. In order to inspire students to consider their own viewpoints and how they impact their relationships with others and the environment, I hope they feel surprise and self-analysis. I will draw inspiration for my concepts from photographs that depict everyday occurrences from a first-person perspective, highlighting small details that foster a closer bond with the environment and invoking Uta Barth’s vision.

Picture 1

The first picture worked well because the gray and white colors created a strong contrast. This made the details easy to see and the image looked good overall. The balance between light and dark elements helped draw attention, making it pleasing to look at and understand quickly.

picture 2

The second picture didn’t turn out well because it lacked clear lines. This made it hard to see shapes and details properly. Additionally, the reflections from the light were distracting, which took away from the image’s overall clarity. It felt confusing and less appealing to the viewer.

picture 3

The third picture was not effective because all the colors were too similar. Without clear contrasts, it was difficult to tell different parts apart. This made the picture look flat and boring. More vibrant colors or distinct lines could have helped grab the viewer’s attention and made it more interesting.

picture 4

The fourth picture worked well because the flower plot created a path-like effect. This added depth and made the image more engaging. The mix of colors and shapes invited viewers to explore the picture more closely. Overall, it felt lively and interesting, making it a strong composition.

picture 5

The fifth picture didn’t do well because the reflection on the lines was confusing. This made it hard to focus on the important parts of the image. The lack of clarity took away from its overall impact, leaving viewers unsure about what to look at and what the picture meant.

picture 6

The sixth picture was ineffective due to distracting light reflections. The shadows were only partially visible, which made the image feel incomplete. This inconsistency took away from the overall look and made it harder to appreciate the details. A more balanced light and shadow would have improved it greatly.

picture 7

The seventh picture didn’t work well because the frame was incomplete. This made the image feel unfinished and less organized. A full frame would have added structure and made the picture easier to understand. Overall, it lacked the coherence needed to make a strong impression on the viewer.

picture 8

The eighth picture was bothersome because the light reflections were distracting. They made it difficult to focus on the main parts of the image. This confusion took away from the overall experience, making it hard to appreciate what the picture was trying to show. A clearer presentation would have helped.

picture 9

The ninth picture was not effective because it didn’t connect well with its subject. This lack of connection made it less interesting and left viewers confused about its meaning. A stronger link to the theme would have made the image more engaging and helped communicate its message better.

picture 10

The tenth picture didn’t turn out well because the frame and reflections were poor. They distracted from the main focus of the image, making it feel cluttered. A better approach to lighting and framing would have improved the picture significantly, making it more appealing and easier to understand.

picture 11

The eleventh picture struggled because the two yellow lines were not balanced. This made the image feel uneven and less pleasing to look at. Achieving a better balance between these lines would have made the picture more attractive and easier for viewers to enjoy and understand.

picture 12

Abstract photography can be defined as capturing images in which the subject isn’t the most interesting element, with blury images. Albert Renger-Patzsch and Aaron Siskind photographed the ordinary to reveal their beauty. Uta Barth reversed the typical use of the camera, shooting out of focus and Andreas Gursky photographs the repetition of elements. During this unit, you will investigate appropriate examples of abstract photography and respond in your own way.

I use abstract photography to capture it by emphasizing textures, colors, and shapes above familiar things. I enjoy taking in my environment as a beginning and searching for curious trends and viewpoints that elevate commonplace objects. I play around with light and don’t worry about sharpness because, often, a little blur improves the atmosphere. It’s a great method for me to express myself and see the world from a different angle because there aren’t any rigid limits.

Abstract photography is a genre that captures photos in which the subject matter is not the major emphasis. Instead, it focuses on shapes, colors, forms, and textures, allowing viewers to interpret the images in a variety of ways. This form of photography frequently distorts reality, promoting emotional or intellectual connection rather than physical one.

List 3 things the photographer might have been interested in capturing in this picture?

The photograph shows different surfaces and layers, such as peeling paint and curled paper, that create a story of age and wear. The contrast between light and dark parts generates a shocking effect, making us think of time and waste. This abstract art invites viewers to consider decay, beauty in mistakes and remains of human activity in abandoned locations.

If you were the photographer, what title would you give it? Explain why?

I would call the photograph “Echoes of Time.” This term expresses the idea that the textures and layers tell stories from the past, demonstrating the impacts of time on the surface. It underscores the idea that even in decay, there is beauty and history, allowing viewers to consider what this evidence may represent about the space and the lives that once inhabited it. The title reflects both the visual impression and the deeper meaning behind the image.

What is some additional information about the 6 elements?

In the photograph, lines form from the paint peeling and crushed paper, leading the viewer’s eye and providing movement to the scene. The irregular forms formed by the layers indicate loss, while constant patterns in the textures add rhythm and visual appeal. The wide variety of textures, ranging from rough to smooth, improves the tactile quality and invites closer investigation. A variety of tones—from deep shadows to dazzling highlights—create contrast and depth, eliciting various moods. Selective focus emphasizes individual details and invites viewers to investigate the quiet interaction of elements in the image.