Alice

"I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious" - Albert Einstein

Page 3 of 4

Mind Map

Photo Safari

For picture 1,2, and 6, I feel like it is representing the shape of the focus. For the third and the last one, it looks like it is trying to show the texture of the object in the picture. For 4,5, and 7, it is describing the line. For picture 8 and 9, it really demonstrates the pattern. At last, I feel like 10 and 11 is trying to represent the form of the photo.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I tried to describe the ninth photo and had this photo as a result. I feel like the ninth photo really shows the pattern of the line, which I think my photo also represents the exact format. However, the photo would’ve been better if it had a higher clarity.

 

 

 

 

 

This photo below was meant to represent the sixth photo, and I feel like it worked pretty well. The use of the circle in the middle describes the photo and the monotone colors also adds some mysterious atmosphere.

 

 

 

 

 

I also really like how this photo turned out! This was meant to represent the third picture, which I believe shows the texture and pattern in an unique way. The photo I took looks really similar to the information picture with its pattern.

 

 

 

 

 

I was trying to show the last pictures horizontal texture, but it didn’t really turned out how I wanted it to be. The photo does provides some texture of the folded paper, however, it doesn’t quite match the example.

 

 

 

 

 

I tried to represent the sixth picture, which emphasized the shape of the focal point. The abstraction between the various colors highlights the photos elements, and I feel like this photograph kind of matches with the picture above; however all the designs seems to be distracting the main point, which was supposed to be the black colored figure.

Analysis of a photograph

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Shell” by Edward Weston

  1. List 3 things the photographer might have been interested in capturing in this picture?
  • the original and pure beauty of the shell
  • the contrast between the black background and the inner part of the shell
  • the monotone that makes the photograph more mysterious

2. If you were the photographer, what title would you give it? Explain why.

If I were the photographer, I would title it “Memories”. The pattern of the inner part of the shell makes me think of something going deep inside, which can also mean having lots of mindful memories that go to my brain, helping me remember those precious moments for a long time. Now, when we look at the general photo, the top left part of the shell, where the shell part starts, represents how memories get into our mind and get more detailed and deeper as they go further into the inside. The usage of color also includes some meanings, as the darker the part of the shell, the deeper it is, and the better the memory it has. To summarize, the photo shows “memories” as the shape and pattern of the shell reminds me of how we have many memories, but the most special moment eventually stays inside the shell, or our brain, letting us remember the memory longer.

3. Describe the use of line, shape, Pattern, texture, tone and focus – USE THE NOTES ABOVE AS A GUIDE. SOME EXAMPLES of WORK BELOW.

I believe the use of texture is masterfully expressed. The photo captures everything from the overall texture to the tiny detailed texture. Especially, the center of the shell is really well-described with the all the swirled texture , which makes the photograph more attractive. Also, the tone of the photograph really grabs the viewers focus as it directly shows the color contrast between the shell and the background. The use of tone is a great way to create depth and visual interest. The focus of the photograph really shows up, too. The clarity of the shell is incredible; it has a sharp and  clear focus, increasing the overall quality and completeness of the photograph. Also, the photographer represented the perfect round shape of the shell, having an outstanding focus and increasing even more engagement.

 

 

Work Cited:

Weston, Edward “Shell” photograph. Dragon’s Exchange, ISB, 15th August 2025. https://dx.isb.cn/dash/#/classroom/945836/sections/lesson/958329/page/958333, Accessed 15th August 2025.

Formal Elements of Photography

Formal Elements, which are also known as line, shape, color, pattern, texture, tone, and focus, are the most basic things we always have in photography. Have you ever seen a photo without any of the formal elements? Even a plain black photo contains color and tone. Photography does not exist without formal elements; they’re like oxygen in our world, something we always have and need for life. Therefore, I define the phrase formal elements as the basics of photography.

  1. Line : If we think of a line, people think of a long thing that is connected to each other, something straight, or even curved. Line can be straight or curved, long or short, and even think or think. Lines can create shapes, pattern, or focus, too.
  2. Shape : Shape is something created by lines; our lines create a square, three lines create a triangle, and organic shapes are made with lines, too. Shapes usually grabs the viewers attention as it increases interest.
  3. Color : Color is something that changes the photographs mood. Light colors show a gentle and calm feeling, while dark colors might represent something sad or terrifying. Every photograph contains color, even a plain photo has the color white; color is necessary.
  4. Pattern : Lots of elements lining with each other equally forms a pattern. Patterns can be made by lines, shapes, colors, texture, and everything! It really snatch our eyes as it’s attractive.
  5. Texture : Texture is basically how something is rough or smooth, or how something feels like. When we look at a rock, we automatically think that the rock will be rough, which also means that the it has a rough texture! Adding on, mirrors, books, or tables can represent a smooth texture.
  6. Tone : Tone is closely related to color, it shows how light and dark colors are. For example, we can say sky blue has a light undertone, and navy has a dark undertone. Tones are really important as they creates interesting scenes.
  7. Focus : Focus is the interesting one, it changes the clarity of the photo. If a photo is out of focus, it means that it’s really blurry, which relates to pictorialism. If a photo has a great clarity, we can clearly see what the photographer was trying to take.

 

Examples for each elements

  1. Color

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is a photo named “Collision 5T” by Barbara Kasten. This photograph creates interested with the variety of colored glasses; red, yellow, and blue. Overlapping glasses creates a new color, too, for example, overlapping  red and yellow glasses looks like an orange colored glass. Like this, colors can really increase engagement and grabs the viewers attention!

2. Tone

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This photo called “Pepper No. 5” by Edward Weston really represents the element “tone” in an mysterious way. The abstraction in this photography emphasizes the light and dark parts of the bell pepper; highlighting the monotone. The use of tone can increase curiosity.

3. Line

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This photo is also taken by Edward Weston named “Onion Halved”. It emphasizes the empty parts of a sliced onion, and the empty parts seems like curvy black lines connected to each other. Those lines also creates an organic shape. These Lines doubles up the mysterious mood and depth.

4. Texture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is a photo named “Chicago” by Aaron Siskind, which shows a great use of texture. The photograph focuses on the paint peeling off of a rough wall. It emphasizes the contrast between the texture of the wall and the peeling paint, which is super cool. Textures often leads the viewers attention as it has a great amount of visual interest and reality.

5. Pattern

 

 

 

 

 

 

This photo named “Tour Finaces” by Ola Kolehmainen shows a repetiton of rectangular shapes that has a great comopsition! The balanced shapes creates a calm and relaxing mood. Patterns can also create rhythms  with its equally repeated objects, which enhances the photographs engagement.

6. Focus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This photograph named “Cabbage Leaf” by Edward Weston emphasizes the focus of the cabbage leaf with its great clarity and the use of the color black as the background. As the photo is in focus, the viewers are able to catch the detailed parts of the object.

7. Shape

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This photo by Edward Weston emphasize the shape of the shell, which eventually leads the viewers attention as it shows the detailed parts of the sell, too. Emphasizing the shape of the shell makes the photo to have a stronger focal point.

Lastly, I believe that an image can’t only show one element. A plain white photo will contain color and tone as it has a “white” color and a “light” undertone. Also, some photos even hold multiple elements, such as the bell pepper photo, it shows color, tone, shape, and form. Therefore, I feel like an image can’t only show a single element.

 

WORKS CITED:

Barbara, Kasten “Colloison 5T” Photograph. Barbara Kasten.net, Barbara Kasten, 2016, https://barbarakasten.net/collision/#4, Accessed 30th August 2025

Edward, Weston “Onion Halved” Photograph. Dragon’s Exchange, ISB, 15th August 2025, https://dx.isb.cn/dash/#/classroom/945836/sections/lesson/958329/page/958334, Accessed 30th August 2025

Edward, Weston “Pepper No. 30” Photograph. Dragon’s Exchange, ISB, 15th August 2025, https://dx.isb.cn/dash/#/classroom/945836/sections/lesson/958329/page/958334, Accessed 30th August 2025

Aaron, Siskind “Chicago” Photograph. metmuseum.org, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/267388, Accessed 31th August 2025

Ola, Kolehmainen “Tour Finances” Photograph. Invaluable.com, invaluable. https://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/tour-finaces-1132-c-5534c45b35, Accessed 31st August 2025

Edward, Weston “Cabbage Leaf” Photograph. americanhistory.si.edu,The National Museum of American History, https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/object/nmah_1384407, Accessed 31st August 2025

Edward, Weston “Shell” Photograph. Dragon’s Exchange, ISB, 15th August 2025, https://dx.isb.cn/dash/#/classroom/945836/sections/lesson/958329/page/958334, Accessed 31st August 2025

ABSTRACTION IN PHOTOGRAPHY

Is photography an art?

Since the invention of photography, critics have argued that it cannot be compared to drawing or painting because creating a photograph was thought to require only pressing a button. This view questioned photography as a legitimate art form. In 1902, Alfred Stieglitz initiated a secessionist movement to challenge this misconception, arguing that photography should be recognized as a distinct branch of art. Pictorialists began to treat photography as a handmade process by applying techniques such as smearing Vaseline on lenses, scratching negatives, and painting chemicals on prints to simulate brushstrokes. This made photography to a  handmade process, ultimately bringing it back to its traditional roots as a handmade art form, also showing that human invention is needed in photography.

In 1950, a revolution occurred in art, except in photography; everything had changed, except photography. Pictorialists still focused on the blurry mood. Then Paul Strand realized that cameras had a unique ability to capture forms sharply and directly, leading to the birth of “straight photography.” This new style marked a clear break from pictorialism. Unlike pictorialists, Strand took subjects as they appeared in reality, with sharp focus and without manipulation. Straight photography emphasized the true and real form of subjects, producing clear and straightforward images.

Additionally, the purpose of taking photographs underwent a significant change. Pictorialists viewed photography as a form of art, incorporating handmade processes and applied art techniques after taking photos, so that the images looked more complete and finished like paintings. Pictorialists manufactured their photos to resemble paintings, aiming to evoke that aesthetic of emotion. Instead, a straight photographer focuses on the beauty of the photo itself and the reality; no manipulation. These types of photographs often convey a clear and sharp sense of beauty in the subject, also focusing on the framing, which represents a distinct departure from pictorialism.

The introduction of straight photography created a significant revolution in the photographic world, inspiring new abstract forms. It introduced a fresh, modern concept that appealed mainly to young photographers. Today, straight photography is one of the most popular styles, followed and developed by photographers such as Andreas Gursky, the photographer of “99 cent”, and Edward Weston, the photographer of “Pepper No. 30.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is a photo named “New York 3” by Aaron Siskind, an abstract photographer. This photo focuses on the wall’s texture and has a clear focus. It also shows a unique form of the wallpaper falling. With this photo as an example, we know that the straight photography movement has influenced Aaron Siskind, as his photograph also focuses on its sharp focus, form, and texture, which were the main points of straight photography.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This photo above called “Pepper No. 30” is one of Edward Weston’s, an American photographer, most popular artwork.  It has a clear focus on the pepper, emphasizing the contrast between the light and shadow with its form. Taken in 1930, “Pepper No. 30” shows a radical departure from the prevailing soft-focus and atmospheric Pictorialist style to a much more pure formal vision. Weston became convinced that: “real photography can only be achieved through realism.” (“Edward”).

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is a photo called “99 cent” by Andreas Gursky. This photo shows a real view of a shop with various color shaded patterns, which grabs our eyes more than each individual products; abstract photography. With this photo as an example, I believe that Andreas Gursky can be considered as a straight photographer as his photos have a clear focus and seems like they’re almost not manipulated at all.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is Uta Barth’s famous photograph name “Field #3”. As this photo, Uta Barth’s artworks are mostly out of focus, which makes her photographs abstract. Also, this lack of clarity informs us that she’s a pictorialist as pictorialists focuses on the blurry and romantic mood.

WORKS CITED:

Andreas, Gursky “99 cent” Photograph. Dragon’s Exchange, ISB, 15th August 2025. https://dx.isb.cn/dash/#/classroom/945836/sections/lesson/958329/page/958334, Accessed 30th August 2025.

Aaron, Siskind “New York 3” Photograph. The Cleveland Museum of Art. Cleveland Museum of Art, 1996, https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1989.468, Accessed 30th August 2025

Edward, Weston “Pepper No. 30” Photograph. Dragon’s Exchange, ISB,15th August 2025. https://dx.isb.cn/dash/#/classroom/945836/sections/lesson/958329/page/958333, Accessed 30th August 2025.

“Edward Weston-Pepper No. 30” Holden Luntz Gallery, Holden Luntz, https://www.holdenluntz.com/artists/edward-weston/pepper-no-30/, Accessed August 30th 2025.

Uta, Barth. “Field #3” Photograph. Uta Barth, https://utabarth.net/work/field/#image-4, Accesed August 30th August.

Definition

How I define Abstract.

To define abstract in one sentence, it is a type of technique with a raw form of expression that people aren’t used to, but it shows representation, providing us with the ability to view the world from various perspectives. Art in general might seem like a planned or manufactured thing; however, abstract art shows and focuses on our real, natural world, which is also the key point of abstract photography. Abstract photography is a way different genre from other arts, as it requires us to focus on something that has always been present in our photos and which might look boring, including lines, shapes, forms, and others. Creating a photograph with an element that isn’t interesting is what makes abstract photography attractive.

Starting Point

Abstract photography can be defined as capturing images in which the subject isn’t the most interesting element. Albert Renger-Patzsch and Aaron Siskind photographed the ordinary to reveal their beauty. Uta Barth reversed the typical use of the camera, shooting out of focus and Andreas Gursky photographs the repetition of elements. During this unit, you will investigate appropriate examples of abstract photography and respond in your own way.

 

The sentence “Abstract photography can be defined as capturing images in which the subject is not the most interesting element” means that the photograph focuses on the shape, clarity, and color rather than the focal point. Additionally, abstraction may lead to a point where photos demonstrate new techniques, including extremely clear focus and perfect repetition within the photographs. Additionally, it may aim to let viewers observe the world from various perspectives, as it expresses an ordinary moment as a weird yet outstanding photograph.

Blog Post 2

First of all, the photo breaks the rule of composition as it is blurry, making it harder for the viewers to look at the detailed parts of the photo. We can tell that the photographer was trying to move the camera to the left when taking the photo, which eventually led to breaking the rule. Additionally, the photo is really zoomed-in, creating an unclear frame, or outline. Even though the photo is having an unclear outline, it also creates a kind of a mysterious and unknown mood, increasing the curiosity of what the photo is about.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Straightforward, this photo is blurry, breaking the rule of being in focus. We can’t really see anything in a clear way; it looks like our world is shaking. Adding on, it has a terrible perspective, the photo is tilted to the bottom right, multiplying the amount of blank space, which is the grey floor. Both the lack of clarity and terrible perspective might lead to some confusion in a negative way, as the viewers get to see lots of black space; however, it might cause some curiosity, too, as in some views, people might be curious about what the upper part of the place looks like.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Because of the perspective of the photo, it builds a great amount of mysterious feeling. There’s a lot of blank space-the floor-which increases the curiosity of the photo as the viewer’s don’t get to see lots of objects.  The photo is taken in a way that it is tilted to the bottom, which is the main reason why we see lots of black spaces. Adding on, it also breaks the rule of composition as we can’t discover the focal point of the photo; there’s no main point in the photograph. Without the focal point, the viewers might lose some interest as they don’t know where to look at.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The rule this photo is breaking is the rule of thirds. The rule of thirds is a guideline for photography, which provides photographers two horizontal and vertical lines so that it is easier to get the focal point in the middle. However, the girl, which is the main point of the photo- is overly in the right side of the photo, creating a large amount of white spaces. Having lots of blank spaces creates a massive amount of an uninteresting atmosphere. Therefore, the poor composition of the photo makes the photo unbalanced and incomplete.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This photo also lacks clearness, which breaks the rule of being in focus. Probably the photographer moved the camera upwards, relating to how the photo includes some movement while it lost its focus. Even thought the photo breaks the rule of photography, it has a sense of beauty. It contains monotone colors, which increases the cryptic mood with some interest. Overall, the way that the photo is breaks the rule leads to some unclear feeling with an increasing interest at the same time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The photo is out of frame and too zoomed-in, so it doesn’t show the outline of the red wall at all. It also lacks a great amount of clarity, making it challenging for the viewers to tell what the photographer wanted to show and what the purpose was. Lastly, there is no color contrast since the main colors—yellow, orange, and red—are all in the same warm mood. While this creates unity, it doesn’t add much visual interest; the photo is boring. Overall, these choices make the photo feel flat and unclear, which challenges the viewer to look beyond the basic idea of phtography and interpret their thoughts about it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This photo breaks the rule of framing as the photo is really closed-up. As a result, the viewers aren’t able to identify the outline of the object. The interesting part of this photograph is that it’s out of focus, but we don’t see any movement of the photographer moving the camera. Also, the photo is underexposed, which means that the photo is too dark with not enough light. This photo is having a dark mood with a black background, only letting us to see the red part of the chair. Overall, every feature of this photo creates a vague and unexpected feeling.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This photo does not have a focal point or the main focus, also breaking the rule of composition. To make a guess, the focal point might be the IB Art poster, or it might be the girl posting in the right; it is unclear. According to the rule of thirds, some might define the focal point as the poster, as it is in the middle. However, the red color of the girl’s hoodie grabs our eyes more, which increases interest. Additionally, the photo is taken in a really awkward way, which is because of the weird perspective. The way the objects are placed is not the best, as we only get to see half of the girl in the frame. Overall, the photograph breaks the rules of photography in various ways, creating lots of confusion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This photo creates a really vague and obscure feeling with it’s tone and clearness. First of all, the usage of grayscale, the different color scale between black and white, of the photo exaggerates the suspicious mood. Some might also say that the photo is partially overexposed as it lacks details in the white parts. Secondly, the photo seems like the photographer slightly moved the camera to the right when taking the photo as it’s out of focus. To conclude, the photo increases the mysterious mood.

Blog Post 1

The photo above is one of John Baldessari’s most famous photos, titled “I Will Not Make Any More Boring Art,” created in 1971. It shows an image with poor composition juxtaposed with the text “WRONG” below the photograph (“Wrong”). The photo captures the moment of a man standing right in front of a tree, creating the illusion that the tree is growing on top of his head. Many critics point out the poor clarity and weak usage of space and balance. Adding on to the poor composition, the use of black and white color greatly increases the visual irony of the photo, suggesting the idea of “Why did he label his own photo wrong?” Today, the world views the image as a “wrong” photograph, not only because the photo is poorly taken, but also because the word “WRONG” affects and influences our interpretation. Every element of the photograph highlights the artist’s observation of the rules of artistic creation. The simplicity of the artwork emphasizes the conceptual focus of the work, which allows viewers to reflect on the judgments made in visual art (“Wrong (1967)”).

Baldessari’s message in the image was, “Why should our work be judged?” Reflecting on this, his thoughts have influenced me to think differently; let’s not judge a photo just by its appearance. Even if we don’t know the purpose of the artwork, the word “WRONG” truly helps us consider how today’s world and Baldessari himself define the word. I believe that having the word in a huge bold font on an image that others might define as a “wrong image” is what makes the photo intriguing. The vocabulary also plays a part in increasing the curiosity of the photo with a sense of wit. The photo seems to suggest how Baldessari wanted others to understand it, utilizing awkward composition and defining it as wrong. I believe he provokes viewers to think about what defines “right” or “wrong” and how such strict rules and aesthetics shouldn’t dictate the judgment of art. The photo criticizes and highlights that creativity given to art is unlimited, and that there’s no wrong photograph.

By understanding the true meaning of a photo such as John Baldessari’s “Wrong,” I believe that a bad photo can definitely be a great photo. We shouldn’t just judge art only by its features, shapes, perspective, etc. Of course, some people might think that a beautiful photo is what we should strive for, which is sometimes correct. However, the purpose of a photo and its interpretation are the significant aspects of photography. Therefore, how perfect and pretty the photo looks isn’t the most important element we should focus on; it’s how well the photo represents the message and purpose that the photographer wanted to express, which is what creates an actual “great” photo. For Baldessari’s photo above, it might seem extremely awkward just with the man standing on the street with a poor perspective and composition; however, the word “WRONG” below the photo truly deepens the viewer’s understanding, making it inspirational and thought-provoking. In conclusion, even though the photo may seem incomplete, a bad photo can definitely be a great photo with the proper context and purpose.

 

Work cited:

Baldessari, John “Wrong” Photograph. Dragon’s Exchange. ISB,19th August 2025. https://dx.isb.cn/dash/#/classroom/945836/sections/lesson/962482/page/962485, Accessed 23rd August 2025

“Context – its about the title – Blog Post 1” ISB, https://dx.isb.cn/dash/#/classroom/945836/sections/lesson/962482/page/962485. Accessed 23rd August 2025

“Wrong – 1967, John Baldessari.” Wikiart, www.wikiart.org/en/John-baldessari/wrong-1967. Accessed 23rd August 2025.

“Wrong (1967) by John Baldessari” Artchive, https://www.artchive.com/artwork/wrong-john-baldessari-1967/, Accessed 23rd August

 

 

 

Stranger than Fiction

During this unit, I read a book called “Lost in the Antarctic: The Doomed Voyage of the Endurance” by Tod Olson. This book is a literary nonfiction that illustrates the story of Shackleton and his crew’s survival during their journey.

This bookclub book is a true story of Shackleton, the boss, and his crew’s journey to the Antarctic in 1914. They had to deal with many crises threatening their lives on their way to the Antarctic. The crews endured the emergencies in various ways and ultimately returned all alive.

PAGE 1

On the first page of my notebook, I explored the key details and ideas in the book’s first chapter. By identifying these points, I tried to understand the author’s main ideas, such as the theme, central idea, and social issues. After reading the entire book, I returned to this page and was surprised that many of my thoughts after reading the first chapter continued to carry over to the later parts of the story.

PAGE 2

The “Text are Complex” page was about identifying new ideas and deepening my thinking about how nonfiction books explore multiple big ideas beyond the obvious ones. On this page, I wrote some parts that could be considered as central ideas at the beginning of the book. The central ideas in Chapter 1 mainly contain information about the risk of going to the Antarctic during the 1900s.

PAGE 3

The theme page was aimed to understand the book’s theme, particularly the life lesson and the author’s intention in all aspects. While reading the book, I learned two meaningful themes: “We should work as a team when dealing with challenges.” and “You should not give up; you will reach your goal.”. These two themes were the most significant life lessons during Shackleton’s journey, and I realized and understood more about the main idea.

PAGE 4

On this page, I pointed out some central ideas with lots of evidence from the book. The first central idea I found was that “Teamwork is the most important factor for survival.” and “The biggest obstacle of the journey was the harsh conditions.”. This page helped me develop my thinking more widely from the beginning to the end of my book.

 PAGE 5

The perspective page clearly illustrates the author’s opinion on the book about working together during challenging situations. The page displays some quotes that support the author’s perspective, especially on p.45, where a quote that perfectly matches the author’s thoughts. After I finished the book, my thoughts changed, and I had the same opinion as the author about the importance of teamwork.

PAGE 6

This page is a cause-and-effect page where I had to show my understanding of how events were connected. My page reflects the complexity of the cause and effect as one cause leads to one effect, which leads to another effect, and another. It was interesting to see the part starting from the weather conflict to the effect of the ship, Endurance, breaking apart.

SYNTHESIZE PAGE

My first synthesized page demonstrates the pattern and connections between the events that occurred, which allows me to see the bigger picture of the book. This page reflects all parts of the events as Shackleton and his crews had to face similar kinds of challenges during the whole journey. After completing this page, I have better understood the flow that connects the events throughout the story.

SYNTHESIZE PAGE (NARRATIVE&INFORMATIVE)

These two synthesized pages were about identifying nonfiction books’ narrative and informative elements. On the narrative side, I summarized the pattern of Shackleton’s journey using quotes that included narrative elements such as dialogue or rising actions, illustrating the events the crew had to overcome. On the informative side, I wrote some quotes that contain informative elements, data, photos, dates, and locations to emphasize the challenging moments that Shackleton and his crew faced.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Alice

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Skip to toolbar