Final Three

The reason I picked these three photos is that I think they work really well as a pair. Each image encourages the viewer to think more deeply about what is happening because there is less visual information than in your average photo. The negative space is clearly defined by the sharp angles, while the small details, like the trees in the corner, add subtle points of interest. All three of my photos were intentionally composed to emphasize the negative space and highlight the dark objects within the frame. By reducing distractions, the viewer’s attention is drawn to the shapes and contrasts that create the composition’s overall impact. I wanted the simplicity to make the images more thought-provoking and to show how even small details can change the way we perceive a scene. Overall, the three photos complement each other while maintaining their own unique visual qualities.

This photo is really cool because of how simple but powerful it looks. The person climbing is shown as a dark silhouette, which makes them stand out clearly against the bright background. You can’t see their face or details, but that actually makes it more interesting since the focus is on what they’re doing instead of who they are. The way they’re holding onto the tall structure makes the picture feel full of energy and determination, like they’re pushing themselves to reach the top. The plain sky makes the whole scene look clean and bold, and even the little bit of tree in the corner adds a nice touch so it’s not just empty space. Overall, it gives off a feeling of adventure and strength, and it’s the kind of photo that makes you stop and really look at it.
This photo looks really cool because of the way it uses contrast. The dark shapes of the building and tree stand out sharply against the bright white sky, which makes the whole picture feel dramatic. The roof on the left has strong, straight lines, while the tree on the right has softer, natural shapes, and that balance makes it interesting to look at. The empty space of the sky keeps the picture simple and focused, so your eyes go straight to the main parts of the photo. The angles of the roof guide your eyes upward, while the branches pull them across, giving the photo a nice flow. Overall, it feels calm but mysterious, almost like the picture is telling a story without showing too much.
This photo looks dramatic because the big dark shape of the building takes up most of the left side, making it feel really tall and a little mysterious. On the right side, the trees and branches balance it out, so the picture doesn’t feel empty. The black silhouettes against the bright sky make everything look sharp and bold, which is simple but really eye-catching. The angle makes the building seem even bigger, while the trees add some softer, natural shapes to contrast with it. Overall, the picture feels strong and a little moody, but also calm at the same time.

Top Ten Pics

-Shape -Negative space -Good outline -Shadow
-Shape -Negative space -Texture of the trees
-Negative space defined by black background -Shape -Texture -Definition
-Texture -Shape
-Color -Vibrance -Line -Texture from tree
-Outline -Shape -Texture
-Color -Light -Line
-Color -Vibrance -Texture -Shape
-Shape -Line -Spiral
-Line -Shape -Angle

Through the Lens of Time

My goal for Through the Lens of Time is to demonstrate how things evolve over time. I want to get people to appreciate the beauty of aging things, like historic structures or the way nature changes over time. I want people to experience a little bit of nostalgia and understand that the world is constantly changing due to time. I’ll draw inspiration from images that highlight aging objects and demonstrate the effects of time with cool lighting or soft focus. Ultimately, I want people to pause and consider that time is something that should not be hurried. Rather, it’s something that adds beauty to the ordinary in ways that most people are unaware of.

Photo Safari

For this image, the shape matches the original image, but the coloring is off because the book it too dark.
This image was closer to the original image than a lot of my other ones, but the white was still a bit too dark because of shadow.
The problem with this photo, is that the colors are inversed.
Again, the wood isn’t dark enough, and the background isn’t light enough.
The background is a bit too dark because of shadows, and the lines aren’t dark enough.
Again, the background isn’t white enough because of shadow.
Background isn’t light enough, and the lines aren’t thick enough.
Colors are inversed, and the pool balls are different shades, but this is all I had. And the number of balls isn’t the same.
The photo is a bit blurry.
Taken from a slightly weird angle.
The road curves too much.
Pattern isn’t exactly the same, but it sort of works.

ANALYSIS OF A PHOTOGRAPH

  • I think the photographer was interested in capturing the value, contrast, and shape of the shell.
  • If I was the photographer, I would name this Monochrome shell.
  • Monochrome Shell works because it’s simple but still says a lot. Monochrome is basically just a fancy word for black and white or one color, so it gives off a clean vibe. It instantly tells you that the photo is about contrast. And Shell is straightforward. It tells people exactly what they’re looking at, but it also keeps it and natural.

ABSTRACTION IN PHOTOGRAPHY

The Pictorialism Movement was a style of photography that emerged in the late 19th century. It basically was a different approach to photography, focusing more on emotion and beauty, than technical accuracy.

Straight Photography was a movement that emerged in the early 20th century as a reaction to the pictorial style of photography. It mostly emphasized sharp focus, clear details, and a more technical approach to photography. Instead of soft and blurry photos loved by the pictorialists, the straight photography movement favored sharp and clear photos that were more objective and realistic. One of the biggest reasons why the Straight Photography movement became so popular among photographers, is that it is a way to show what photography can do on its own, without imitating other art forms.

Many Photographers were greatly influenced by the straight photography movement. Among these photographers were Edward Weston, and Aaron Siskind. Weston is a key figure in Straight Photography. He embraced its principles by focusing on clarity, detail, and form. While influenced by the Straight Photography Movement, Siskind’s work leans toward abstraction but still retains the core ideas of straight photography.

Gursky’s images often depict vast scenes—like landscapes, architecture, or crowds—that are so large and detailed they lose their immediate readability. His style leans more toward pictorialist. Barth’s work is abstract because it challenges traditional focus and subject matter.

Starting Point

Abstract photography can be defined as capturing images in which the subject isn’t the most interesting element. Albert Renger-Patzsch and Aaron Siskind photographed the ordinary to reveal their beauty. Uta Barth reversed the typical use of the camera, shooting out of focus and Andreas Gursky photographs the repetition of elements. During this unit, you will investigate appropriate examples of abstract photography and respond in your own way.

-I think that “Abstract photography can be defined as capturing images in which the subject isn’t the most interesting element”, means that the photo doesn’t have one defining feature, but can be of multiple things, maybe even focused more on the background than the actual subject of the image.

Wrong

-I did not focus on any particular item or scene -The quality is low -The photo is blurry -There is a random reflection from the window -Taken at an awkward angle -My foot is in the scene
-I took it at a weird angle -The lighting is terrible -Quality is low -Hard to tell what I am even trying to capture -Taken at an awkward angle -Light is reflected randomly
-I took it at a weird angle -Quality is low -Hard to tell what I am even trying to capture -Taken at an awkward angle -The viewer has no idea what the object is
-I took it at a weird angle -The lighting is terrible -Quality is low -Taken at an awkward angle -Light is reflected randomly -Rule of thirds is not applied
-I took it at a weird angle -The lighting is terrible -Quality is low -Hard to tell what I am even trying to capture
-I took it at a weird angle -The lighting is terrible -Quality is low -Hard to tell what I am even trying to capture -Taken at an awkward angle -Light is reflected randomly -Texture not really captured because of the light -Lines are not matched or even
-I took it at a weird angle -The lighting is terrible -Quality is low -Hard to tell what I am even trying to capture -Taken at an awkward angle -Light is reflected randomly -Part of the wall is shown which isn’t the object I am trying to capture
-I took it at a weird angle -The lighting is terrible -Quality is low -Hard to tell what I am even trying to capture -Taken at an awkward angle -Light is reflected randomly
-I took it at a weird angle -The lighting is terrible -Quality is low -Hard to tell what I am even trying to capture -Taken at an awkward angle -Light is reflected randomly -Rule of thirds does not apply -Motion can be seen
-I took it at a weird angle -The lighting is terrible -Quality is low -Hard to tell what I am even trying to capture -Taken at an awkward angle -Rule of thirds does not apply