Frank

"I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious" - Albert Einstein

Category: Humanities

Humanism in the Renaissance: Revival of Human Potential

Renaissance Humanism by Frank Su [STUDENT]

“You cannot teach a man anything, you can only help him to find it for himself,” Galileo—an Italian Astronomer during the Renaissance—once said.

The churches during the feudalistic times tried former approach; education was limited and dogmatic. Like the Dunning-Kruger effect, this helped them maintain power, as peasants did not know what they had been missing out on.

So what is humanism? No, it’s not the study of humans. Rather, an intellectual movement led by Francis Petrarch during Italy’s Renaissance, “typified by a revived interest in the classical world and studies which focused not on religion but on what it is to be human” (World History Encyclopedia). This revival is demonstrated in the name “Renaissance”, meaning “revival” or “rebirth” in French as to symbolize the coming back of Greek and Roman culture or intellect.

But how did this start? It occurred during the Renaissance. After the fall of feudalism due to multiple factors such as the Black Death, people began questioning religion; if God truly cares for us, why inflict such terror on us all?

It laid the blueprints for the Reformation, and “played a crucial role in shaping both the intellectual and religious landscape of Europe,” being a major inflection point in history (Humanism, Britannica).

Personally, my viewpoints on this universe align very well with those of humanists:

Humanism emphasizes the importance of education in achieving one’s potential. This is achieved through teaching and providing one with the tools to understand the world. You can give a man a fish and feed him for a day, but teach him how to fish and he will be fed for the rest of his life. I deeply resonate with this approach, and it can be seen in many of our courses in ISB as well. For example, in math, while Chinese schools tell children to memorize formulas and how to apply them, like giving them fishes to eat, our school teaches students how the formulas are derived, teaching us how to use them. This makes it so that when scenarios are slightly changed, we are still able to apply this knowledge because we fully understand it. This fully encapsulates my attitude towards learning; as an avid learner, I want to dig deeper to what we learn in class—not just what it is, but why it’s the way it is. This way, I can connect things to the bigger picture and feel more confident in my knowledge as well. Furthermore, the focusing on individual potential in humanism allowed for a more fluid social structure, as people could move classes depending on how productive they were in society.

On the other hand, humanism also upheld values I resonate with today.

The shift in thinking from the feudalism to humanism meant the beginning of breaking free from standardized ways of learning, which they achieved through secular inquiry—secularism and individualism. As people challenged religious institutions such as the church, the power of those institutions were also jeopardized. An example of this would be the Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus’s theory that the solar system was heliocentric, instead of being geocentric which was adopted by the Catholic Church. Hence, humanism’s philosophy of questioning everything has contributed to figuring out solutions for countless phenomenons—even now—and those breakthroughs directly impact us today. Like our math teacher said, she doesn’t follow one single textbook. She takes information from a broad mix, because staying with one will always mean you lose out on another thing, like staying with education only from the church. I find myself to be aligned with this belief, as I often wish to create my own route in life and do not depend on a single person for guidance, similar to the individualist belief. This is because I want to understand how everything works—not just listening to other people, but finding out for myself.

Moreover, I also align with other values of humanism aside from thinking. Humanism emphasized valuing the current life and less of the life after death. Comparatively, the afterlife was more valued during feudalism due to its social structure. Peasants, making up to 85% of the population, lived horrible lives, so they wanted to invest in the life after death through religion, as if it were a way of escaping. As the church’s power waned during humanism, more people began to focus on the life they currently had, but this is not to say that religion was completely gone. As an agnostic person, I have mixed feelings about the afterlife. Regardless, the importance of life should not be diminished with the promise of something afterwards, so I try and cherish my life every day.

I previously mentioned that people began relying less on religion. But then, what did they focus on? They put more trust into the reality through science, math, and logic. This is also seen in modern days, where we have the freedom of right to choose whether we believe in a religion or not: religious freedom, which is a “fundamental human right and the first among rights guaranteed,” in the United States Constitution (Newsroom). The drastic increase in scientific advancements allow us to view the world through different lenses. Rather than believing that it is “God’s choice” that it rains today or tomorrow, we can see and experience the beauty of science; evaporation, condensation and gravity. As a student, I am not easily swayed through emotion, even though I may display it a lot. Instead, I care more about logic and the statistics, which cannot be easily changed. This connects to the belief of the observing and analyzing characteristics of humanism. It provides stability in a constantly fluctuating world; you cannot do everything right, so you must fall towards doing what is best for the majority.

Finally, humanism emphasized individual opinions. Consequently, trade of art and other items rapidly increased. Artists also began to be more keen to capture the reality of human beings and not just Christ. These paintings that were full of life were then spread across the world through inventions such as the printing press by Johannes Gutenberg and paper in China spread through the Silk Road. This impacts all of our lives, as it makes distributing information much more efficient and easy. As centuries pass, we wind up with social media, a platform allowing us to conveniently express our ideas, without the worry that the Catholic Church might hunt us down and try to execute us for treason; like Galileo, who died on house arrest after his theories were claimed to be “heresy” by the church.

Ultimately, I align myself with the philosophies of humanism, and it has undoubtably shaped our lives today; whether that’s seen today through education for all, religious freedom, critical thinking, or social media.

 

 

Works Cited (mostly for small details I wanted to add e.g. quotes or deeper connections, the infographic and explanations are 90% from our lessons):

Insperity
Study.com
World History
Britannica
The Art Story
LibGuides
National Library of Medicine
Newsroom

Q1 Reading Reflection

Right now I think I am in a good flow with my reading. I read about 20 minutes a day, unfortunately 10 of those are from DEAR (Drop Everything and Read!) in humanities. I read many different genres, ranging from fiction to historical fiction to non-fiction. Currently, I am reading “Salt to the Sea” by Ruta Sepetys. I feel like 20 minutes a day of reading may not be enough, so I am looking to increase my reading time with the weekends.

This connects to my goal, which is to read about 40 minutes or an hour on weekends. It’s realistic and achievable, while also being extremely beneficial for my academic life. I will keep track of this with a stopwatch and writing it down on an application, which might be Notion or Notes.

With the Push of a Razor–Found Poem

My found poem was created based off of one of the conflicts in the short story “Lather and Nothing Else” by Hernando Téllez, using Canva, Procreate, and Microsoft Word. My poem shows the self versus self internal conflict of the protagonist, where he, a revolutionary, struggles to choose between “cowardly” killing the leader of the opposing political side when he came for a shave, or letting him go alive and only doing his job as a barber.

In paragraph 29, where the protagonist mentions “It was going to be very difficult to explain how I had had him at my mercy and then let him go, alive and shaved,” shows that he has a certain degree of responsibility as a revolutionary. However, the internal debate is further illustrated when he reflects on whether it was his job as a barber to kill him, or if he wants to be “The man who murdered Captain Torres… a coward”. Throughout the story, the protagonist continuously ponders the two options, until at the climax where he decides that “You’re an executioner and I’m only a barber,” letting the antagonist out alive.

In paragraph 30, the protagonist thinks to himself: “And to think how easy it would be to kill him. And he deserves it,” shows that he is trying to justify killing the man. However, in paragraph 33, the protagonist also justifies letting the antagonist go, because “no one was worth the sacrifice to becoming a murderer”.

My poem employs these mind games and the back and forth bickering in the protagonist’s mind with the use of repetition: the constant mentioning of “I was a revolutionary” but also “I was a barber, proud” and “not murderer”. This shows how the two conflicting identities both resonated deeply with the protagonist, and how coming to a final decision was tough, hence the internal conflict. My poem also includes the protagonist’s imagination, how he’d have to “flee, take refuge” if he commits the murder, showing how the dilemma was constantly on his mind.

Another conflict present is an external human versus human conflict. Paragraph 14 describes Torres as “a man with a good imagination; after all, it hadn’t occurred to anyone before him to string up the rebels and use various parts of their bodies for target practice.” This shows how Torres was a dangerous man who was cruel in an unimaginable way, and that he may present danger if he senses anything wrong with the protagonist or that he was a revolutionary, hence why the protagonist has to be “feigning casual unconcern” (paragraph 17).

My poem expresses this danger with the vivid description of the protagonist’s body language: the use of words such as “shakes”, “disoriented”, and “to my alarm” the moment the antagonist enters the shop— indicating an ”enemy on home turf”. Furthermore, these keywords help set the atmosphere from the beginning for readers who may have not read the full story. The additional mention of the protagonist’s bandolier and gun presents even more reason for the protagonist to be anxious.

For the art I drew, I decided for it to be the scene when the protagonist imagines his life after he murders Torres. The blood river matches “the scarlet stream”, and the absence of a light source (such as the sun) shows the darkness his world will plunge into if he kills Torres. The sophisticated font of “a scarlet stream, I’d flee, take refuge” represents the complexity of the choice the protagonist will have to make, and that it isn’t as simple as it may seem. The other picture is of the protagonist giving Torres a shave. It is black and white except the barber chair and the razor, the two things that will determine the protagonist’s destiny. Both pieces I have used Procreate, and some parts of the art I have traced from online pictures.

The title of the poem is “With The Push of a Razor” because by adding just a little force, the protagonist can greatly change the course of his life, highlighting the conflict and that the protagonist must thoroughly think through and pick a side. The background of the poem is a vintage newspaper background, to fit the “found poem” aesthetic, while it is also split in a curved half of blue and red, representing the good and the bad—letting Torres alive or killing him, respectively. Some words such as “murderer”, “barber”, and “scarlet stream” are enlarged to better convey the conflicting ideas to the reader.

 

© 2025 Frank

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Skip to toolbar