- I think the rules of photography were made to identify a good photo. This is because there are so many photographers with unique thinking, and if we accept all those ideas, as a rule, there will be so many rules which make photography complicated. Therefore, those rules are the general ideas from many photographers which make the photo look good.
- I believe photos should include precise subjects to help audiences well-understand the image. Also, I think they should be good purposes to make the audiences interested.
- If the wrong part of the photo helps the photographer describe the purpose of the photography, it would be good to break the rule. Also, if the photo context breaks the rules like John Baldessari’s photography, it would be acceptable to break the rule.
- Yes, because I also broke some rules of photography before I knew them. For example, I did not know the rules of third, so I usually took full-screen photos when I took pictures.
- First, the wrong photos can be great because they include their identity and characteristics. Also, the context is pivotal in photography because if people can not understand the message and the purpose of the photography, the photography would be less valuable because there are no people interested in it, which means that no one would like it and buy it.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.