In 2020 alone, more than 45000 Americans died to a gun (BBC). That is not even counting the firearm deaths in the rest of the world, or how many people were injured in a shooting! According to the 16th of the UN Sustainable Development Goals – Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions, “People everywhere need to be free of fear from all forms of violence” (UN). That includes gun violence, lethal or otherwise. Although there are many reasons why people own guns, banning guns also has some benefits, and there are many alternatives to giving people easier access to guns for self-defense.
There are many reasons why people want to own guns. For some people that live in high-crime areas, owning guns could be one of the only ways for them to protect themselves (Foundation For). For example, in 2001, two people broke into Terry Pickle’s shop in Salt Lake City, and just immediately started shooting (Armour). However, Pickle and his son picked up their own guns, and fired back, successfully driving out the intruders (Armour). Some others believe that owning guns would help them keep their workspaces safe, and that having guns at work would discourage crime. In fact, Stephanie Amour stated that “Gun-owner groups say employers who ban guns are stripping away workers’ right to defend themselves on the job” (Amour). Another reason is that for some people, firearms – and the right to own them – hold great symbolic meaning. In the USA, the Second Amendment of the US Constitution states that “…The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Legal Information Institute). The gun culture in the US has been passed down through generations, and many see it as a symbol, for many different things. According to Henry Allen, “[Firearms are] symbols of protection of the home…equality…fighting for liberation and family tradition.” For them, it is part of their culture. The above are some of the most prominent reasons why people own guns.
Banning guns would reduce the firearm death rates, but if guns are not handled carefully, they will cause a lot of damage. First, the banning of firearms would greatly reduce the firearm death rates. For example, in 2018, 74% of the homicides were due to firearms (Aradhya). If guns were banned, these 74% of people killed could be saved (Aradhya). In 1996, Australia reformed their gun laws for a stricter gun control policy, and since the new laws were passed, the number of firearm-related homicides fell exponentially (Kiely). Not only did the firearm homicide rate fall, the suicide rate also fell as well (Kiely). On the other hand, if guns are not handled with great care, they can cause a lot of damage. According to Philip Alpers, “…New Zealand police lost control of guns when they stopped registering 96% of firearms. Now it’s those most common, unpoliced firearms which almost invariably turn up in day-to-day gun crime” (Hunt). Almost 40,000 deaths a year involve firearms in the US alone (BBC). Banning guns have been proven effective in reducing the firearm death and crime rates, while not carefully monitoring firearms has the opposite effect.
Homicide Rates In Australia, From 1996 to 2013. Image Source
An alternative to giving citizens guns for self-protection is by focusing on how to reduce crime. One way this could be achieved is by inspecting – and improving, if need be – the police system so that more citizens can place their trust in the police. In the article “Gun Control Comes from a Place of Privilege”, the author states that for people living in high-crime areas, a gun could be the only way for them to protect themselves, because the police had given up on the area. However, giving the public easy access to guns would make it easier for criminals to get their hands on said guns as well. In order to make these high-crime areas safer, authorities could work towards getting the police system to a place where the police would not simply give up on high-crime areas. After all, the whole point of the police is to fight crime and keep the people safe. If the police cannot be trusted to resolve dangerous situations, then the people would not be safe. Likewise, leaders could place a higher emphasis on security in general. For example, people could install security cameras in places where crimes frequently occur, to deter criminals from committing crimes in such areas. Additionally, authorities could increase efforts to deter crime in the first place. Some say that instead of gun control, people should work on tougher sentencing, harsher penalties and better parenting in order to reduce crime (Stezelberger). While that would work, these changes would take a long time to implement – especially better parenting – so in the meantime, tightening gun control would be a way to make communities safer as people work towards these bigger goals. The above are all possible alternatives to guns that would still make people safer, but would also let communities benefit from the extra security that comes with tighter gun control.
In conclusion, while many have reasons for owning guns, there are also many benefits that comes with banning guns, and instead of having lax gun control in favor of giving people weapons for self-defense, there are many alternatives that can still keep people safe and provide the added security of proficient gun control at the same time. Even though guns are very important and can certainly save someone’s life, they can just as easily take it away. Like all tools, if guns are not monitored correctly, they can cause a lot of damage. If the 16th UN Sustainable Development Goal is to be achieved, then a certain amount of gun control would be necessary.
Works Cited
Allen, Henry. “Why Do Americans Love Guns? They’re Part of Our Culture.” Washington Post, 26 Dec. 2012. SIRS Issues Researcher, explore.proquest.com/sirsissuesresearcher/document/2262466416?accountid=4047.
Aradhya, Venus. “Should Guns Be Banned?” Voicesofyouth.org, 8 July 2021, www.voicesofyouth.org/blog/should-guns-be-banned. Accessed 12 May 2022.
Armour, Stephanie. “Companies That Ban Guns Put on Defensive.” USA Today, Dec. 2004. SIRS Issues Researcher, explore.proquest.com/sirsissuesresearcher/document/2265675219?accountid=4047. Accessed 12 May 2022.
BBC.com. www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41488081. Accessed 25 May 2022.
“Buffalo Shooting: Ten Dead in Racially Motivated Attack at New York State Store.” BBC News. BBC News, www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61452958. Accessed 15 May 2022.
Foundation For Economic Education. “Gun Control Comes from a Place of Priviledge.” CE Think Tank Newswire, Jan. 2022. SIRS Issues Researcher, explore.proquest.com/sirsissuesresearcher/document/2626089963?accountid=4047. Accessed 12 May 2022.
“Gun Violence Must Stop. Here’s What We Can Do to Prevent More Deaths.” Prevention Institute, www.preventioninstitute.org/focus-areas/preventing-violence-and-reducing-injury/preventing-violence-advocacy. Accessed 25 May 2022.
Hunt, Elle. “New Zealand: Ardern Flags Further Gun Control Reforms after Firearms Charges Peak.” Wellington, Mar. 2021. The Guardian, www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/15/new-zealand-ardern-flags-further-gun-control-reforms-after-firearms-charges-peak. Accessed 15 May 2022.
Kiely, Eugene. “Gun Control in Australia, Updated.” FactCheck.org, Oct. 2017, www.factcheck.org/2017/10/gun-control-australia-updated/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwg_iTBhDrARIsAD3Ib5iErk0-cYRtEd5NdsXwr54ZOmwUnKETNWT4FqG_ucmUjWgymDrSyggaAl6cEALw_wcB.
Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment. Accessed 25 May 2022.
Stezelberger, Gerard. “Your View by a Gun Store Owner: Why We Must Stand up for Our Second…” Morning Call (Online), 6 Sept. 2019. SIRS Issues Researcher, explore.proquest.com/sirsissuesresearcher/document/2314112336?accountid=4047.
UN People. “Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions.” Sustainable Development Goals, UN, www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/peace-justice/. Accessed 31 May 2022.
Recent Comments