Success Criteria Reflection
In this project, I set three success criteria to measure our progress and determine what constitutes success. Upon reflecting on our experience, I believe that the first success criterion – building a rubber-powered plane that can stay aloft for over 20 seconds and remain stable during flight – was the hardest to achieve. This was due to the technical skills, tweaking design elements such as wing shape, weight distribution, and rubber tension, as well as experimenting with different launch techniques.
Jenny and I have worked together on previous projects and have experience in teamwork and collaboration, which does not make the second success criterion challenging. The third success criterion can be achieved through good planning, effort, and communication which are skills I also have experience with.
Despite this, we faced challenges in our project, such as crashes during flight tests. In order to address these issues, we had to rebuild and redesign our plane three times and thoroughly analyze each test flight to identify areas for improvement.
One key lesson I learned from this project was the importance of considering external factors, such as wind conditions and launch techniques, in achieving our success criteria. For example, in our first flight test, I threw the plane against the wind instead of towards it, resulting in the plane getting knocked out. In our second test, Jenny threw the plane upwards instead of forwards, leading to a 180-degree flip and a nose-dive. Our third test, which took place indoors, was also unsuccessful as we did not have enough wind current to generate lift and air pressure.
In conclusion, despite our efforts and experiences in teamwork and communication, building a rubber-powered plane that can stay aloft for over 20 seconds and remain stable during flight proved to be the most challenging of our success criteria. However, we learned valuable lessons about the technical skills required, as well as the importance of considering external factors in achieving our goals.
Safety Considerations Reflection
During the planning phase of our project, Jenny and I did not give much thought to the safety protocols we should follow. However, we were reminded of the importance of safety when handling superglue during the course of this project. We learned that it is important to wear gloves while handling superglue to avoid any potential accidents.
During our first crash, Jenny attempted to glue the broken pieces of our plane together with super glue. Unfortunately, her plan backfired as she accidentally glued the propeller to her hand, and had to wash her hands with warm water and soap for over 10 minutes to detach the plane. This incident highlighted the importance of not only wearing gloves but also being cautious when using any kind of adhesive or sharp objects during the construction process. As a result, we learned to prioritize safety and ensure that we have the necessary protective gear and follow proper handling procedures when working with potentially dangerous materials.
Manufacturing Reflection
During this project, one of the manufacturing processes that we found to be very effective was creating a template for our plane’s wing design. We used a piece of cardboard to create a stencil for the wing shape, which allowed us to quickly and accurately trace the shape onto our balsa wood sheets. This saved us a lot of time and helped ensure consistency in the wing design across all of the sheets we cut.
Additionally, we found that using a hobby knife to cut the balsa wood sheets was much more effective than using scissors or other cutting tools. The hobby knife allowed us to make precise cuts and shapes, which was important for ensuring that all of the parts fit together correctly and that the plane was balanced.
Another effective manufacturing process we used was creating a jig for the wing assembly. The jig held the pieces of the wing in place while the glue dried, which helped ensure that the wing was straight and symmetrical. This was especially important for our deep chamber wing design, which required precise alignment of the wing components.
Overall, by using templates, hobby knives, and jigs, we were able to manufacture the parts of our plane quickly, accurately, and with a high degree of precision. These processes helped us create a well-crafted and balanced plane, which was crucial for achieving our goal of a stable and controlled flight.
Controversial Decisions Reflection
The decision to use super glue instead of polyfoam glue was a controversial decision which had both positive and negative effects. On one hand, using super glue allowed us to move quickly through the construction process. We were able to glue components together in a matter of minutes whereas the polyfoam glue would have taken 2 times longer. Additionally, super glue created a very strong bond between the material which ensured our plane was sturdy and could withstand the stress of flight.
Despite this, superglue is an adhesive that contains organic solvents. Once these solvents get into contact with Polyfoam, this will cause Polyfoam to melt. This is a big problem because one of our main materials is Polyfoam but we decided to go with super glue because of the time constraint we had.
Planning Reflection
Throughout the planning process for this project, there were several key decisions and strategies that we implemented that ultimately led to a successful outcome. One of the most effective planning strategies we used was to break down the project into smaller, more manageable tasks.
Another planning strategy that proved to be very effective was to establish clear roles and responsibilities for each team member. I mainly focused on building the body of the plane while Jenny focused on the wings. This allowed us to work more efficiently and productively, and to ensure that everyone was contributing in a meaningful way to the project.
We also made sure to establish clear timelines and deadlines for each task, which helped us to stay on track and to ensure that we were making progress at a steady pace. By breaking the project down into smaller tasks, we were able to create a more realistic timeline that accounted for unexpected setbacks and delays.
Finally, we made sure to communicate regularly and openly with each other, which helped to ensure that we were all on the same page throughout the project. We held regular meetings to discuss our progress and to identify any potential roadblocks or challenges that we might encounter, and we worked collaboratively to find solutions to these problems.
Overall, the planning process for this project was very effective. By breaking down the project into smaller tasks, delegating responsibilities, establishing clear timelines, and communicating openly and regularly, we were able to work efficiently and effectively as a team.
Recent Comments