Alex

"I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious" - Albert Einstein

Category: Photography (page 2 of 2)

SETS PART 1: Select and Analyse an artist and their work

Uta Barth:

Padlet gallery of Barth’s 8 most interesting photographs and quotes :

https://isbeijing.padlet.org/alexma10/uta-barth-6642lacttoslmmyz

Analyze of Barth’s work:

  1. Blurred Focus: Many of Barth’s photos have a blurred focus, making the subject hard to see clearly. This technique encourages viewers to look closely and find meaning in what isn’t fully shown.
  2. Exploration of Light: Barth often captures how light changes and interacts with everyday objects and spaces. By focusing on light, she creates a visual experience that can change how we see familiar places.
  3. Domestic Settings: A lot of Barth’s work is made at her home, using everyday objects and scenes. This choice highlights the beauty and complexity of ordinary life, encouraging viewers to notice things they usually overlook.
  4. Sequential Imagery: Barth often uses a series of images that show different versions of a theme or subject over time. This repetition highlights changes in light and perspective, showing how time passes.
  5. Abstract Composition: Her compositions often focus more on space and color than on traditional subjects. This abstraction helps viewers feel a sense of uncertainty, making them think about how they see their surroundings.

Why is Barth’s work considered Abstract?

Uta Barth’s photographs are abstract because they focus less on specific subjects and more on the overall visual experience. By using blur and unusual framing, she encouragesviewers to think about what they are seeing instead of just identifying objects in the picture. This creates a sense of mystery, making familiar scenes feel strange through her lens. By highlighting light, space, and how we perceive things, Barth turns everyday moments into thoughtful experiences that make us rethink what photography and seeing really mean.

Why Uta Barth?

Uta Barth’s abstract photography inspires me because of its unique ability to challenge traditional views of visual perception. Her use of blurred backgrounds and interesting lighting creates images that focus on fleeting moments, drawing attention to what is often overlooked in our peripheral vision. This style invites viewers to engage actively with the artwork, searching for meaning in the absence of clear subjects. Barth once said, “…to walk without destination and to see only to see,” which resonates deeply with her photography. It emphasizes the beauty in everyday experiences and encourages a mindful observation of our surroundings which I resonate with.

I chose Uta Barth because her abstract photography connects with my vision of showing the hidden beauty in everyday life moments that could easily slip away. Her use of blur and unusual framing makes viewers think more about what they see, which inspires me to capture moments that often gounnoticed. To adapt her style in my own photography, I will play with shallow depth of field and the focus on light and space.

Evaluating One of Uta Barth’s work:

l chose Uta Barth’s “Field #9” because it beautifully captures the idea of seeing without focusing on specific details. The way the image is blurred makes it feel like a moment in time, allowing viewers to connect with their own experiences and thoughts. What is unusual about this photograph is how it makes an ordinary scene look abstract and dreamlike. Instead of showing a clear subject, the blur creates a sense of mystery, making us wonder what we are actually looking at and encouraging us to think about it in our own perceptions and give our own interpretations. The use of light in “Field #9″ is important because it adds depth and atmosphere to the photograph. It creates a soft glow that enhances the feeling of movement and space, inviting viewers to feel the warmth and emotion behind the image. This focus on light helps us appreciate how it shapes our understanding of what we see.

Citation: Uta Barth | Field 1995-1998. utabarth.net/work/field/#image-7.

Mind Map

citation:

Uta Barth | the Official Website. utabarth.net.

Photo Safari

The first picture is pretty straightforward, we can see the element of “lines” dividing the two sides into half. On the left, I took a photo of the selling’s light and the dark spaces beside it. I would say my image “worked out” compared with the drawing because it’s a pretty straightforward line divide method and because that I also  used black and white to capture these photos.

The second picture is taken in a hallway, of a sign. I intentionally blurred the background and used black and white lens to try to replicate the drawing on the right. We could see the element of shapes in the drawing. I would say I did a mediocre job, the image didn’t 100% work out because the focus is not blurred enough.

The third picture is taken outside the field, it is a picture of the grass outside. I figured that the grass’s Intensive pattern would resemble the drawing. We could see the elements of pattern and texture because there are a reoccurring pattern of dots in the grass, and the roughness of the texture. I would say that this worked out because the texture and patterns of the grass is very similar with the drawing.

The forth picture is a picture of the pipes on the ceiling. We could see elements of “pattern” and a bit of “lines” represented in the pictures. When I was looking for things that had patterns like the drawing on the right, I looked up and saw the three pipes and realized that the pipes resembled the drawing. However, I would say that the photo mildly worked because there are other structures beside the three pipes.

The fifth picture is taken outside on the field of two trees. We could see the clear element of “Line” in the picture. I would say it worked 75% because of the other structure and objects around the two trees, but overall it works out.

The sixth image is a picture of the back of a computer. We would see the element of “Shape”.  Because it is only one shape, I thought it would resemble the drawing on the right. Now looking back and seeing the picture again, I would still say that expect for the fact that the photo is not 100% a circle, it worked.

The seventh photo is a picture of the floor outside of the film studio. We could see elements of “Pattern”, “Line” and “Texture”. I would say that comparing the photo with the drawing, it worked, because the pattern of the lines are the same with the drawing and it fits the scene.

The eighth picture is a photo of the stone pavements outside the design center. I was walking outside looking for things that looked like the drawing, and the answer was on the ground all alone. We could see the element of “Pattern” represented in the photo. I’ll be harsh and say that this one did not completely work, because the drawing is a synchronized pattern of circles, and the photo is just not in a very consistent pattern.

The ninth photo is taken outside of the field, behind a football goal net. We could see clear elements of “Pattern” and “Line”.  The lines on the net creates a pattern that resembles the drawing on the right. I would say that this photo worked because the pattern of the football goal net matches the drawing and the background of the picture is also blurred which gives more resemblance.

Now, the tenth photo is one of my proudest pictures out of the twelve. It is a picture of an empty dark room with a beam of light escaping the barrier of the door. We could see elements of “Texture” and “Tone” in the picture. I would say that after adjusting with the camera for a long time and finding the perfect angle to capture the photo, it worked because of the similar cuts and lightings between the drawing.

The eleventh picture is also one of my proudest pictures out of the twelve. It is captured the same way as how number 10 is captured. We could again see elements of “Texture”, “Tone”, and now even “Focus”. As you can see this time, I also shifted the focus of the camera to the beam of light in front to create a dynamic feeling in the picture, making the end of the beam of light feel mysterious and a sense of into the unknown… Moreover, I would say this worked because it matches the drawing’s cuts and tone distributions.

And finally, the twelfth picture is also one of my proudest pictures out of the twelve (saving the best three for last). I was looking all over the school to find number 12’s bizarre patterns, and when I looked down, I saw the cafeteria’s wooden floor and suddenly got inspired by its unique pattern. In this photo, we could see elements of “Line” and “Pattern”. I think that the patterns of the lines in number 12 is pretty hard to replicate, so I would say that my photo worked because It was pretty close with the drawing and the idea was pretty creative .

Analysis of a photograph

Edward Weston might have been interested in capturing the natural beauty, symbolism of the shell, and the abstract forms of the shell in the photo. For natural beauty, I believe that he aimed to show the elegant forms and textures of the shell, highlighting its organic beauty. For symbolism of the shell, Weston perhaps saw the shell as a symbol of life and existence, blending physical beauty with deeper meanings. Finally, I think Weston most likely focused on the abstract qualities of the shell, using its shapes and lines to create a visually striking art work.

If I was Edward Weston, I would title this photograph “Nature’s Elegance.” Because this title reflects to the graceful and timeless beauty of the shell, emphasizing its natural artistry. I also believe that the title “Nature’s Elegance” was what Weston was trying to showcase when he took “Shell” which connects Weston and the photography.

The Use of Visual Elements in “Shell”:

Line: The smooth curves of the shell creates a flowing lines that guide the viewer’s eye around the image.

Shape: The shell’s unique shape combines both organic and geometric forms, making it visually fascinating.

Pattern: The elegant patterns on the shell’s surface add depth and complexity to the photograph.

Texture: Weston’s lighting enhances the shell’s texture, making it appear tactile and inviting to touch.

Tone: The photograph features a rich tone range, from deep black to bright whites, which emphasizes the shell’s 3D-ness.

Focus: The sharp focus on the shell isolates it from any background distractions, allowing the viewers to appreciate its details 100%.

Citation:

“Shell, 1927 – Edward Weston – WikiArt.org.” www.wikiart.org, www.wikiart.org/en/edward-weston/shell-1927-1.

Formal Elements of Photography

Formal Elements:

The phrase “Formal Elements” in photography means the basic parts that create the visual structure of a picture. These elements are important for photographers to know and use when taking photos because they can greatly improve how a photograph look and the meaning behind it.

Line

Lines are important in photography because they can lead the viewer’s eyes through the picture. They can be straight or curved. For example, a road or a river can create a line that draws your attention to a specific spot in the photo. Lines can also show movement or direction, making the image more dynamic and lively.

Shape

Shape refers to the outline of an object in a photo. Shapes can be simple like circles and squares or more complex like the shape of a tree or a person. When photographers highlight shapes, they help make subjects stand out and become the main focus of the image.

Pattern

Patterns are created when shapes or colors repeat in a photograph. You might see patterns in nature, like the way leaves grow on a tree, or in man-made objects, like how the bricks repeats Patterns in buildings. Patterns can make photos interesting and fun to look at because they create rhythm and balance.

Texture

Texture is about how things feel or look like they would feel if you could touch them. For example, rough tree bark or smooth water can create different textures in a photo. Photographers use lighting to make textures come out, helping viewers feel more connected to what they see in the image.

Tone

Tone refers to the lightness or darkness of colors in a photograph. It helps create depth and contrast between different parts of the image. In black-and-white photos, tone becomes especially important because it guides the viewer’s attention without color distractions. A good range of tones can make an image look more dramatic and interesting.

Focus

Focus determines which parts of a photo are sharp and clear while others may be blurry. This helps direct the viewer’s attention to what is most important in the image. A well-focused subject stands out against a softer background, making it easier for viewers to understand what the photographer wants them to notice.

Can an image show just one element at a time?

Yes, an image can show just one element at a time. Close-up shots, such as a photo of a flower, can highlight only the flower itself while excluding everything else around it. Isolated objects, like a painting of a single apple on a plain background, draws the viewer’s attention to that specific item.

Citation:

Focus: Understanding the 7 Formal Elements of Photography. focus.picfair.com/articles/7-formal-elements-photography.

 

My Definition of Abstract Photography

Abstract photography is when the common accepted subject in the photo isn’t the most interesting element, and it is what is beside or aside the subject that is actually the main focus of expression. Abstract photography breaks the conventional ways of expression and goes for a more “abstract” or “wrong” approach.

Starting Point

“Abstract photography can be defined as capturing images in which the subject isn’t the most interesting element. Albert Renger-Patzsch and Aaron Siskind photographed the ordinary to reveal their beauty. Uta Barth reversed the typical use of the camera, shooting out of focus and Andreas Gursky photographs the repetition of elements. During this unit, you will investigate appropriate examples of abstract photography and respond in your own way.”

I think that this unit will be very interesting and fun because we will go for a different approach on photography by breaking the typical rules of photography and seeing a whole new different perspective of art. I think the phrase “Abstract photography can be defined as capturing images in which the subject isn’t the most interesting element” means breaking the conventional rules or perspectives of Photography to create something “different”. When it comes to abstract photography,  the main subject in the photo isn’t the most interesting element anymore, it is what is beside or aside the subject that is actually the main focus of expression. Abstract photography breaks the conventional ways of expression and goes for a more “abstract” or “wrong” approach.

 

Citation:

A. Develop Ideas through Investigation | International School of Beijing. (n.d.). https://dx.isb.cn/dash/#/classroom/648607/sections/lesson/344121/page/344123

The 10 “Wrong” Photography contact sheet

This is my 10 “Wrong” Photography contact sheet:

Context of photography

CONTEXT OF THE PHOTOGRAPH “WRONG”:

In 1967 John Baldessari exhibited his ‘wrong’ series. He uses a selection of photographic images anchored by text. The most famous of which titled ‘wrong’ shows an image with poor composition juxtaposed by the text ‘wrong’ bellow the photograph.

The irony of the word is what makes the image so appealing, just blatant judgement of the photograph. The message that Baldessari was trying to say in the image is why should we conform to conventional aspects of art or photograph, why does our work have to be judged? The interesting fact is that an idea cannot be wrong or right as it is executed as a personal response. John Baldessari once stated: “You don’t want anyone to say, ‘You can’t do that!’

 

Good art is often more about its context than how it looks. For example, does an acrylic painting of a common soup can (“Andy Warhol. Campbell’s”)  show more talent than the Mona Lisa? Probably not, but the concept behind the artwork and the social issues it addressed made it significant.

John Baldessari’s photograph titled “Wrong!” demonstrates that he was aware of the photography rules he was breaking. Unlike amateur photos that might not follow the right settings, Baldessari was a skilled photographer who intentionally challenged these rules. He understood composition and lighting but chose to go against them, showing his creativity.

Baldessari famously said: “I will not make any more boring art” (“John Baldassari”), which adds value to his work. He was pushing against traditional photography norms, while others may have stuck too closely to the rules, making their work less exciting. There is nothing wrong the picture because art isn’t about right or wrong. But if you were to look at it technically, it could be “wrong” because it is in black and white, unfocused and boring. This context helps us see why Baldessari’s photograph is more engaging and impactful. Without this background, people might misinterpret the art and think that they could take better photos than Baldessari.

 

 

Work Citied: Baldessari, John “Wrong” Photograph. Dragon’s Exchange, ISB, 22nd August 2024. https://dx.isb.cn/dash/#/classroom/648607/sections/lesson/344114/page/344116/edit, Accessed 22nd August 2024.

Andy Warhol. The Museum of Modern Art, https://www.moma.org/collection/works/79809.

Bonjour Supermarché. “A Brief History of John Baldessari.” YouTube, 15 May 2012, www.youtube.com/watch?v=eU7V4GyEuXA.

—. “John Baldessari Explains His ‘Strange Mind.’” YouTube, 29 Apr. 2019, www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_UWot6kqhg.

Newer posts

© 2025 Alex

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Skip to toolbar