Tairan

"I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious" - Albert Einstein

The Cuban Revolution – A Latin American Hero?

Garcia is a retired M-26-7 rebel from Fidel Castro’s rebel group and a sugar farmer. Over time, he has realized the meager contributions Castro had given to Cuba and grew to no longer respect him as he used to. The Cuban Revolution – Latin American Hero? is the story of Garcia’s conflicts, externally, against the oppressive Cuban government, and internally, against his own beliefs.

 

The Cuban Revolution ended in the late 1950s, while Fidel Castro retired in 2008 in favor of his brother. After a long rough patch with the United States, especially after the USSR fell, Cuba has finally started to get back on its feet, economically at least. Since Fidel Castro took over as military dictator, the percentage of Cubans that were literate in reading and writing remained as one of the highest in the world. Socialist reforms were implemented, and the sugar production industry thrived. But did the conditions really improve? Was the revolution worth it?

The Cuban Revolution may not have been as well known as other revolutions, but its impact on Latin America has been felt (and is still being felt!). It’s a tale of bravery and battles against all odds of a small island nation in the Caribbean that became a hotbed for Cold War politics. However, that’s not all – this revolution had far-reaching consequences that almost led to a nuclear war between two economic superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union! And why did America, Cuba’s leading trade partner, place a trade embargo on its crucial sugar exports? The answers to these questions and more will be revealed in the fascinating story of the Cuban Revolution, explained in Plain English. (8-1 edition)

Google It – A Secret to Success

Google It by Crowley Redding is an intriguingly styled non-fiction book, retelling the story of Larry Page and Sergey Brin and how the pair founded the multi-billion dollar company Google we know today. Along their decades of work on what was originally just a homework assignment, they had implemented countless software and hardware upgrades, created several smaller companies, each focused on providing a different type of service, and, most importantly, changed their name from Backrub to the Google we know today.

However, I believe Google It’s fascinating tales are not only told because of its’ fun stories and history, but because Crowley Redding saw a lesson worth teaching behind the history of one of the biggest companies in the world: ‘The user is first priority’. This phrase is seen paraphrased multiple times throughout the book, and is even said to be one of Larry and Sergey’s main secrets to success.

Above was a notebook page noting many interesting quotes I found over the two-week course of reading the book (more are in the form of post-its stuck in my copy). I noticed that many of the quotes were from right before a success of Google’s of some kind, and generally went like this: “Google was easy on the eyes and easy to use” (also contrasted with the visually unappealing pains of using other search engines that were too bright, full, or loud with images) “If an ad was useful, people would click on it. If an ad wasn’t particularly useful, fewer people would click on it” (noting the difference in popularity between something that many people felt they needed and was useful, and something fewer people wanted or needed).

Many of these quotes lead to creations like AdSense (which brought relevant ads to relevant people), which was one of Google’s biggest income sources and many additions to Google that resulted in, again, a popularity rise later on. These cause-and-effect relationships are clear pieces of evidence towards one thing, or concept: “The user is first priority”.

I also compiled many of my notes into another cause and effect visual; One might note that many of the points were similar to before: “The process to find information before Google was lengthy and annoying”. Larry and Sergey noticed this, attempted to fix the flaws of, the very thing you, the reader, are using to read this article: hyperlinks, which was its’ inability to, despite being able to travel from one page to another, return from that page back to the original. Users found this incredibly more efficient and spread the word (see the trend?).

A more detailed example. Picture this: You desperately want to look up the image of a new popular outfit, celebrity, or important event. Before (and during the beginning of) Google, image-based search simply did not exist. Google developers noticed this, and, catering to the requests and needs of millions of users online, quickly figured out a way to add this. Image-based search today is regularly incorporated into every search engine, and is something that I myself would have some trouble living without. The intended audience (the troubled, desperate web-surfers) was, unsurprisingly, very pleased.

This is another visual representation of my thinking at an earlier stage: pink highlights the very important key words, yellow represents the main/central idea, and blue shows a supporting, smaller idea or note. My central idea, “Considering the intended audience is the best way to gain popularity” was, despite a work in progress, what I ended up adding to and eventually sticking to. In the end, this is applied to many things we now see as normal: updates in a popular game, software patches in a glitchy website, and even school activities like correcting formatives and summatives through teacher feedback to create a better product. Larry and Sergey recognized it. Extremely successful companies recognized it. And maybe Crowley Redding, the author, wants you to recognize it as well.

Humanism During the Renaissance

The Renaissance was mainly known as the era during the Middle Ages in which classical art, literature, and ideals were rediscovered from the ancient era. One of the many things that flourished during that time period was known as Humanism, a concept of thought. Humanism mainly focused on 4 things: Individualism, the belief that humans had unlimited potential, a skepticism of religious faith, specifically in Christianity, and a “reawakening” of many things founded back in the time of ancient civilizations like Greece and Rome. After some brief thought, I gave myself a 15/20 total score, which means that I’m ~75% a Renaissance era humanist. I do believe that many of Humanism’s practices and beliefs are completely valid, such as the mindset to improve oneself instead of serving a higher lord. With that said, I also disagree with some minor points, such as the major believe that humanity had “unlimited potential”. The word “unlimited” is a bit exaggerated by itself, so it might do to change it into something like “great”.

Mary, the Murder, and the Lamb

Above is a found poem made from the short story “Lamb to the Slaughter” by Roald Dahl. “Lamb to the Slaughter” is mainly about a woman named Mary Maloney, who kills her husband with the leg of a lamb after he confesses that he wants to leave her. She is then left with the choice of just turning herself in to the police or hiding the truth, which she realizes and chooses the latter after remembering that she was six months pregnant with a child.  The found poem conveys both the internal and external struggle of Mary, from a quiet and peaceful night to “love dazed, mind rejected”, which conveys the confusion and refusal to believe that her husband, Patrick is truly leaving her. This is then transitioned into “Police arrived, questions asked”, which implies that something has happened (a murder), with the “Weapon missing, skull smashed”, the whole of which deals with Mary’s external conflict. The two overall conflicts discovered are P v S (person vs. society, in which Mary hides the truth from the police and law enforcement) and P v S2 (person vs. self, where Mary deals with her own internal conflict from her husband leaving her to her killing him. There is no clear antagonist in the story, with the protagonist being Mary, as the story is mainly told from her point of view, which, while the poem does not explicitly include her name in the poem, it can be implied that it revolves around one specific person or event.

Circuits – But Textiles are Included

Over the course of the period I like to call: “Online Learning III”,  we have begun the E-Textiles unit in Circuits class. One of my projects, the Christmas Tree Pin, was made of cut out felt pieces and electrical components like the battery holder and conductive thread. The combination of felt/fabric and electrical components are called E-Textiles.

My latest project is a little more complicated. Over the course of a month or two, I have learned how to correctly sow, name and utilize electrical components so that they both look decent and work decent, although I am still working on consistent backstitches, a way of sowing that involved doubling back on the last stitch so that there is a continuous line that can be used in the design. The latest project, instead of just including a switch and a couple LEDs to light up mindlessly, includes a CPX, that looks really complicated, but in reality is quite simple to use.

Christmas Pin

As you can see, my previous project had ugly grey and yellow streaks that look out of place in the green, brown and turquoise.

The CPX, as shown below in the pictures of my project that serves as the “core’ of my decoration/design, is a rounded circuit-board that consists of neo-pixels, a sort of LED that uses Red Green and Blue lights to light up with whatever color is required, pins, the part where conductive thread is connected to and leads the electrical signal along its’ thread, sensors for the sort who like to take interaction to another level, and some buttons that can be coded.

I thought that using normal thread as part of the design and hiding the “ugly but useful” conductive thread was a bit bland, so I decided to use backstitches with the conductive thread with the design, and the circuit being the design itself. I sew all of this onto a black sheet of fabric that I manually cut and sow onto a bag, so that it looks like the circuit is “infecting” the bag with a glitch of some sort. Personally, I think that using the conductive thread for more than one use, and including the circuit in the design itself is better than having to cover the random odd grey stitches in a perfectly unspoiled, pristine design. If you have any thoughts on this, you can comment your opinion with the “comment” function of this website.

The front side of my project, yet to be finished

My improvements, other than hand-sowing, lie, in what I believe, the planning department. At the start of this unit (or rather, this class), I struggled to draw an accurate, clear model of what I wanted my project to look like, and actually get it to work. But now, I can design and plan my project with generally clear drawings, with LEDs, positives and negatives, and pin locations included. If I don’t get the design right first try, or I miss something, I can take constructive criticism and improve it (hopefully). Down below, I have a picture of my plan, the original plan being unfunctional, but after Mrs. Kim gave me an idea of what a functional design should look like with the CPX (which I am still learning to use and code with), I redrew it with a hopefully functional and detailed plan.

My plan; updated.

My plan; updated. 

I try to take helpful advice in my planning to make it clearer to ‘read’ and functional, which, I believe, is something I was generally bad at at the start of the year. A good design should contain labels as to where the input and output is, be clear to the common observer with experience in reading designs, and also include components required to make the design a reality (I filled in a chart on the back of the paper, but only because prompted; In retrospect, I should make a habit of this, to ensure I have everything I need to start the project). Awareness of these things should help me become a better circuit designer as a whole, which I try to be.

Christmas Pin (Because it’s Christmas)

A little note: I had more than one attempt in this. The first design was a bit too small, so I changed the size to better fit the circuit. I also did not originally plan the extra back bit, because I did not take the pin into account. In terms of decoration design, the main change was that I added an extra triangle on top of the tree because I thought it looked better.

Having failed my first attempt, I made notes on what I did wrong and made changes to the design. First, and most important: since my pin design was too small, I made it bigger so I could fit the battery holder AND the LEDs without the circuit getting tangled and short-circuit itself (the battery holder doesn’t look too big but when you look at my pin in comparison, it’s chunky). This was easy, but I decided not to increase the size of the tree, so I could have extra space on the sides if I needed it (this was a good decision). Sewing the circuit while accounting for the pin was more challenging. I cut an extra thin sheet of light-brownish felt and cut out parts for the battery holder. I planned to have the LEDs facing inside, so the light shines through the thick felt better (I ended up poking some holes in the thick felt because it was still hard), while the battery holder ATTATCHED to the thick felt. Sewing the LEDs onto the new thin sheet of felt was challenging, but I madde it work eventually. This is what it looked like:

(In the process of sewing the circuit)

My next step was to perfect the design. I had sewn in the LEDs, but I realized that the battery holder limited the yellow star LED to nearly the edge of the pin. If you remember, I added an extra triangle on top of the tree. The main reason was to adapt to my mistake, and the second reason was that it looked better than the original flat-topped tree. This is the (mostly) finished tree design below:

Front design

Back design

Having needed to adapt to the pin on the back (in order for the pin to actually, you know, be a pin), I tried sewing it to the very top, right next to the top LED, although I forgot one thing: the pin was metal. Metal, when in contact with conductive materials (in this case, conductive string from the circuit), may short-circuit the circuits and stop working. This is what happened to the top LED, and since I connected the circuit of the first LED with the second LED in order to make it a parallel circuit, all the LEDs stopped working. I realized my problem and just put a small piece of felt between the pin and the conductive thread, and, voila. The LEDs were working fine. I could switch it on and off as I liked. Here’s a picture:

(It may be a little unclear because of the light background, my workplace being in front of a window, but you can faintly see the two LEDs.)

Now, you may realize that I didn’t sew in my initials yet.

 

And you’d be right. (LOL)

 

I noticed this and used (slightly messy?) backstitch on the bottom-left corner to fix the problem.

I SWEAR IT’S CLEARER IN PERSON

 

What do you think?

Protected: Cardboard Arcade stuff

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Welcome to Your New Blog!

When you blog you create posts and posts are categorised according to your subject. Some categories have already been set up for you. If you need more categories you can add them as needed. It’s important that your posts have the following:

  • An engaging title – this should not include the name of the subject since this is referenced in the category.
  • Body – this is where you share your learning. This can include text, images, embedded videos from Dragons’ Tube or elsewhere. You should always consider how your post looks to your audience. Is it engaging? Do they want to keep reading?
  • Category – select one that has been set for you or add a new category. Posts can have more than one category e.g. Humanities and Myself as a Learner

Click on the images below to learn more about blogging:

 

 

© 2024 Tairan

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Skip to toolbar