The strong contrast of the rectangles are clearly visible.

Similar to the reference photo, the sign is small with a white and green icon on a black background.

However, the emergency exit symbol is not strongly emphasized, and It seems the spatial contrast is little weak.

The area with multiple dots is very well represented.

But, due to shadows in the photograph, the elements appear less distinct.

The sharp horizontal lines are clearly represented in the photograph.

The number of lines is slightly more than in the reference.

The vertical line contrast is present in the photo, However it would have been better if the colors(or thicker line) were more distinctly separated.

The central circular shape is clearly defined.

The checkered pattern is accurately represented in the photograph.

However, unlike the reference image, the dividing lines between sections are not emphasized; instead, the areas themselves stand out. The lines are thin so that it makes them insufficiently prominent.

The regular arrangement of the circles are clearly shown, but there are fewer circles than in the reference.

The angles are a bit off, causing the photo to look slanted.

The photograph has same angle and tilt as the reference image, but the effect is slightly weaker.

It would have been better if taken more from the side.

Likewise previous photo, the effect is little bit weak. I’m happy with the angle.
Because the pattern is mixed, the horizontal lines are not clearly visible.